It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GDOT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GDOT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
GDOT (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while PT (@Savings Banks) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.07%.
GDOT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
GDOT | PT | GDOT / PT | |
Capitalization | 545M | 14.4M | 3,785% |
EBITDA | 126M | -88.79M | -142% |
Gain YTD | -6.673 | -0.033 | 20,022% |
P/E Ratio | 73.23 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.83B | 52.7M | 3,474% |
Total Cash | 1.88B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 73.4M | N/A | - |
GDOT | PT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PT's Valuation (6) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for GDOT (95) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew significantly faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.
PT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as GDOT (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.
GDOT's SMR Rating (91) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to PT’s over the last 12 months.
GDOT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PT (79) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to PT’s over the last 12 months.
GDOT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.
GDOT | PT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% | 1 day ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago69% | 5 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 9 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDOT has been loosely correlated with NAVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDOT jumps, then NAVI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GDOT | 100% | +3.01% | ||
NAVI - GDOT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
NNI - GDOT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
BFH - GDOT | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
SYF - GDOT | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
ALLY - GDOT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More |