Ad is loading...
GDOT
Price
$10.25
Change
+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
89 days until earnings call
PT
Price
$0.96
Change
-$0.04 (-4.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

GDOT vs PT

Header iconGDOT vs PT Comparison
Open Charts GDOT vs PTBanner chart's image
Green Dot
Price$10.25
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Volume$504.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.96
Change-$0.04 (-4.00%)
Volume$7.07K
CapitalizationN/A
GDOT vs PT Comparison Chart
Loading...
GDOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDOT vs. PT commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDOT is a StrongSell and PT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (GDOT: $10.25 vs. PT: $0.96)
Brand notoriety: GDOT and PT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDOT: 112% vs. PT: 24%
Market capitalization -- GDOT: $481.28M vs. PT: $17.38M
GDOT [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $481.28M. PT’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $17.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDOT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDOT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GDOT and PT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDOT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GDOT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

GDOT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -5.79% price change this week, while PT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDOT is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.14% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDOT($481M) has a higher market cap than PT($17.4M). GDOT YTD gains are higher at: 3.535 vs. PT (-13.514). GDOT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. PT (-57.14M). GDOT has more cash in the bank: 716M vs. PT (231M). GDOT has less debt than PT: GDOT (67.1M) vs PT (400M). GDOT has higher revenues than PT: GDOT (1.5B) vs PT (173M).
GDOTPTGDOT / PT
Capitalization481M17.4M2,764%
EBITDA103M-57.14M-180%
Gain YTD3.535-13.514-26%
P/E Ratio70.08N/A-
Revenue1.5B173M868%
Total Cash716M231M310%
Total Debt67.1M400M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDOT vs PT: Fundamental Ratings
GDOT
PT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6487
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PT's Valuation (34) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GDOT (87) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew somewhat faster than GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

PT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as GDOT (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

GDOT's SMR Rating (91) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew similarly to PT’s over the last 12 months.

PT's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as GDOT (58) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to GDOT’s over the last 12 months.

GDOT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that GDOT’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDOT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GDOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CINF154.853.23
+2.13%
Cincinnati Financial Corp
XBIT6.620.13
+2.00%
XBiotech
SBRA18.35-0.04
-0.22%
Sabra Health Care REIT
KELYA13.92-0.04
-0.29%
Kelly Services
RVYL1.07-0.14
-11.57%
Ryvyl

GDOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDOT has been loosely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDOT jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDOT
1D Price
Change %
GDOT100%
+0.20%
SYF - GDOT
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
SLM - GDOT
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
LPRO - GDOT
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
BFH - GDOT
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
NNI - GDOT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More

PT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PT and ATLC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PT and ATLC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PT
1D Price
Change %
PT100%
-4.00%
ATLC - PT
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.50%
EDNMY - PT
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
UWMC - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
WU - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
GDOT - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More