GDRZF
Price
$3.55
Change
+$0.20 (+5.97%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
295.89M
SBMCF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
7.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDRZF vs SBMCF

Header iconGDRZF vs SBMCF Comparison
Open Charts GDRZF vs SBMCFBanner chart's image
Gold Reserve Ltd. (Bermuda)
Price$3.55
Change+$0.20 (+5.97%)
Volume$91.7K
Capitalization295.89M
Silver Bullet Mines
Price$0.18
Change+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Volume$110.11K
Capitalization7.05M
GDRZF vs SBMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GDRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDRZF vs. SBMCF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDRZF is a Hold and SBMCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GDRZF: $3.55 vs. SBMCF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: GDRZF and SBMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDRZF: 114% vs. SBMCF: 222%
Market capitalization -- GDRZF: $295.89M vs. SBMCF: $7.05M
GDRZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $295.89M. SBMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDRZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDRZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GDRZF is a better buy in the long-term than SBMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDRZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBMCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDRZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBMCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBMCF is a better buy in the short-term than GDRZF.

Price Growth

GDRZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while SBMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +24.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDRZF is expected to report earnings on May 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDRZF($296M) has a higher market cap than SBMCF($7.05M). GDRZF YTD gains are higher at: 124.684 vs. SBMCF (101.353). SBMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.37M vs. GDRZF (-7.09M). GDRZF has more cash in the bank: 41.6M vs. SBMCF (13.4K). GDRZF has less debt than SBMCF: GDRZF (0) vs SBMCF (887K). GDRZF (0) and SBMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GDRZFSBMCFGDRZF / SBMCF
Capitalization296M7.05M4,201%
EBITDA-7.09M-3.37M210%
Gain YTD124.684101.353123%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash41.6M13.4K310,448%
Total Debt0887K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDRZF: Fundamental Ratings
GDRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDRZFSBMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBAVX30.20N/A
N/A
JHancock Balanced R5
DHIAX19.65N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill International Inv
GCGIX35.46N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Instl
MNBAX20.03N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
PAHTX6.70N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps C

GDRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GDRZF and SBMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDRZF and SBMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDRZF
1D Price
Change %
GDRZF100%
+5.97%
SBMCF - GDRZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+10.11%
RMLFF - GDRZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
SBSW - GDRZF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
ITRG - GDRZF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
MTA - GDRZF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More

SBMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMCF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMCF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMCF
1D Price
Change %
SBMCF100%
+10.11%
SLVMF - SBMCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDRZF - SBMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
CRTIF - SBMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARBTF - SBMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - SBMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
More