GDX
Price
$89.70
Change
+$1.43 (+1.62%)
Updated
Aug 14, 12:36 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
27.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLVP
Price
$37.62
Change
+$1.13 (+3.10%)
Updated
Aug 14, 11:39 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
974.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SLVP

GDX vs SLVP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) offers broad exposure to approximately 60 global gold mining companies, providing greater diversification within the precious metals mining sector compared to the more concentrated iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP).
  • SLVP tracks silver and metals miners with roughly 30 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.39%, versus GDX’s 0.51%, resulting in a cost advantage for SLVP while introducing higher concentration risk.
  • Both ETFs follow passive indexing strategies focused on equity exposure to mining companies rather than direct commodity ownership, with GDX emphasizing gold producers and SLVP blending silver and select metals miners.
  • Top holdings in GDX include major gold producers such as NEM, AEM, and Barrick Gold, while SLVP features greater weight in silver-focused names alongside some overlap in precious metals firms.
  • GDX generally exhibits a larger asset base and higher liquidity profile, whereas SLVP’s narrower thematic focus on silver may lead to distinct volatility patterns tied to silver price dynamics and operational factors in mining equities.
  • Investors seeking gold-centric sector exposure may prefer GDX for its scale and breadth, while those targeting silver and metals mining with cost efficiency could lean toward SLVP’s structure.

Introduction

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) both target equity exposure within the precious metals mining industry but pursue differentiated strategies. GDX emphasizes gold mining companies globally, while SLVP focuses on silver and select metals miners. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors seeking thematic exposure to mining equities amid fluctuating commodity prices and sector-specific operational trends. Comparing them highlights differences in diversification, costs, and thematic emphasis relevant for portfolio positioning in the current market environment.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets companies primarily engaged in gold mining activities worldwide. The fund typically holds around 60 securities, with top positions concentrated in leading producers such as NEM, AEM, Barrick Gold, WPM, and Franco-Nevada. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on materials, specifically gold mining equities. It carries an expense ratio of 0.51% and follows a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing. GDX stands out for its established liquidity profile and broad representation of the gold mining sector.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) Overview

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is a passive fund designed to track the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. This benchmark includes global companies primarily involved in silver mining, with some exposure to related metals miners. The ETF maintains a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 30 holdings, featuring names such as Hecla Mining alongside select precious metals producers. Allocations remain focused within the materials sector but tilt toward silver-centric operations. SLVP offers a lower expense ratio of 0.39% and employs a market-cap-weighted approach with regular index rebalancing. Its distinguishing feature is the narrower thematic emphasis on silver and metals mining equities relative to broader gold-focused peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a macroeconomic environment shaped by gold and silver price movements, interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into mining equities often respond to commodity trends and earnings cycles of major producers. Regulatory factors, including environmental standards and permitting processes, influence operational costs and expansion plans across the industry. Both gold and silver mining face risks from input cost inflation, labor dynamics, and reserve depletion, while benefiting from potential supply constraints and sustained investor interest in precious metals as portfolio diversifiers. Sector momentum remains tied to broader commodity cycles rather than isolated equity-specific events.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDX has provided exposure aligned with gold price trends and the operational performance of large-scale gold miners, often demonstrating resilience during periods of monetary policy shifts or economic uncertainty. SLVP’s silver-focused mandate has historically resulted in amplified sensitivity to silver price volatility and earnings variability among smaller or specialized miners. Relative positioning shows GDX benefiting from greater scale and diversification, which may moderate drawdowns compared to SLVP’s concentrated holdings. Both ETFs reflect sector rotation dynamics driven by commodity price movements and macroeconomic factors such as real yields and currency fluctuations, with performance differences stemming primarily from thematic emphasis and portfolio concentration levels.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader diversification across approximately 60 holdings, established liquidity profile, and consistent exposure to leading gold mining equities, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) for investors prioritizing sector breadth and scale within precious metals mining. SLVP’s lower expense ratio and silver-centric tilt present a compelling alternative for those seeking cost efficiency and thematic specificity, though its higher concentration introduces elevated risk characteristics. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and thematic alignment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SLVP commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a StrongBuy and SLVP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 28B vs. SLVP (974M). SLVP has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX: SLVP (6.933) vs GDX (2.915). GDX was incepted earlier than SLVP: GDX (20 years) vs SLVP (15 years). SLVP (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than GDX (0.51). SLVP has a higher turnover GDX (50.00) vs GDX (50.00).
GDXSLVPGDX / SLVP
Gain YTD2.9156.93342%
Net Assets28B974M2,875%
Total Expense Ratio0.510.39131%
Turnover50.0074.0068%
Yield0.852.3736%
Fund Existence20 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSLVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLVP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFYF63.670.79
+1.25%
SoFi Social 50 ETF
QQXT103.840.64
+0.62%
First Trust NASDAQ-100 ex-Tech Sect ETF
AGZ108.920.37
+0.34%
iShares Agency Bond ETF
LIAU251.94N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF
XME115.27-1.52
-1.30%
Stt Strt®SPDR®S&P®Mtls &MngETF

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
-2.96%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
KGC - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
WPM - GDX
94%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
PAAS - GDX
92%
Closely correlated
-9.70%
More