GDXJ
Price
$132.59
Change
+$3.45 (+2.67%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
9.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GOAU
Price
$49.78
Change
+$1.24 (+2.55%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
221.03M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDXJ vs GOAU

GDXJ vs GOAU Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU)

Key Takeaways

  • GDXJ is a passive ETF tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, providing exposure to small- and mid-capitalization gold and silver mining companies, while GOAU is actively managed by U.S. Global Investors with a focus on precious metals producers and royalty/streaming firms.
  • GDXJ typically holds 80-120 securities emphasizing junior miners for higher growth potential but greater volatility, whereas GOAU maintains a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 30 holdings with significant allocation to royalty companies that offer leveraged exposure to metal prices with lower operational risk.
  • Expense ratios differ modestly, with GDXJ at 0.52% and GOAU at 0.60%, reflecting the active management component in the latter.
  • Both ETFs target the precious metals mining sector but differ in market-cap focus and strategy, with GDXJ offering broader diversification across junior names and GOAU tilting toward established royalty and mid-tier producers.
  • Sector allocation for both centers on materials, primarily gold and silver mining, with GOAU incorporating a higher proportion of royalty and streaming businesses that derive revenue from production without direct mining operations.
  • Liquidity profiles favor GDXJ due to larger assets under management (AUM) and higher trading volumes compared to the smaller, more specialized GOAU.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to gold and precious metals miners often evaluate GDXJ and GOAU as complementary or alternative vehicles within the same thematic space. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly with broad equity benchmarks but instead provide targeted access to the mining sector, where performance is driven by commodity prices, production costs, and operational leverage. GDXJ emphasizes smaller, higher-risk junior miners through a rules-based index approach, while GOAU employs active selection with a notable royalty and streaming tilt. Comparing them helps investors align portfolio construction with preferences for passive breadth versus active concentration in the precious metals ecosystem.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

GDXJ seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and silver mining. The ETF holds approximately 87 to 121 securities, with allocations concentrated in junior and early-stage miners across global markets. Top holdings typically include companies such as those with significant exploration or development-stage assets, though specific names rotate with index rebalancing. Sector exposure remains almost entirely within materials, focused on precious metals. The fund operates as a passively managed, market-capitalization-weighted ETF with an expense ratio of 0.52%. Rebalancing occurs periodically to maintain index alignment. Distinguishing features include high-beta characteristics to gold prices and greater liquidity relative to individual junior mining stocks.

U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) Overview

GOAU is an actively managed ETF from U.S. Global Investors that invests in companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from precious metals production, with a strategic emphasis on royalty and streaming firms. The portfolio typically comprises around 28 to 32 holdings, featuring concentrated positions in names such as Franco-Nevada Corp (FNV), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), and OR Royalties Inc (OR). Sector allocation centers on materials, with meaningful exposure to royalty businesses that provide metal price leverage without direct mining costs. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%. As an active strategy, the fund employs discretionary selection rather than strict index replication, allowing flexibility in response to company fundamentals and sector dynamics. Key characteristics include a weighted average market capitalization around $15-16 billion and a focus on established producers and royalty entities for potentially more stable cash flows.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a macroeconomic environment shaped by gold and silver price trends, inflation expectations, interest rate movements, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into the space often accelerate during periods of monetary easing or heightened uncertainty, benefiting miners through improved margins and project viability. Regulatory factors, including permitting timelines and environmental standards, influence development-stage companies more acutely than royalty firms. Sector risks encompass commodity volatility, rising input costs such as energy and labor, and execution challenges at mining operations. Both ETFs participate in this ecosystem, with GDXJ more sensitive to junior miner sentiment and GOAU positioned to capture royalty income streams that can exhibit different cyclical patterns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, GDXJ has demonstrated higher sensitivity to gold price movements due to its junior miner focus, often amplifying sector returns in both directions compared to broader precious metals benchmarks. GOAU's royalty-heavy composition has provided a degree of downside protection during operational disruptions while still participating in metal price rallies. Relative positioning reflects these structural differences: GDXJ offers greater diversification across smaller names but with elevated volatility, whereas GOAU's concentrated active approach emphasizes companies with established revenue models. In environments of rising metal prices and favorable cost structures, both benefit, though the magnitude and consistency vary with holdings profiles and management style.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor GDXJ at present for its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the junior mining universe, and established liquidity profile, which may support more consistent trend participation in favorable precious metals environments. GOAU’s active royalty tilt offers distinct risk characteristics that could appeal in specific cycles, but the passive efficiency and scale of GDXJ align with probabilistic preferences for cost-efficient, diversified exposure in this thematic segment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDXJ vs. GOAU commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a Buy and GOAU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 9.86B vs. GOAU (221M). GOAU (16.964) and GDXJ (16.532) have matching annual dividend yield . GDXJ was incepted earlier than GOAU: GDXJ (17 years) vs GOAU (9 years). GDXJ (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than GOAU (0.60). GOAU has a higher turnover GDXJ (36.00) vs GDXJ (36.00).
GDXJGOAUGDXJ / GOAU
Gain YTD16.53216.96497%
Net Assets9.86B221M4,462%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.6087%
Turnover36.00181.0020%
Yield2.761.09253%
Fund Existence17 years9 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXJGOAU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GOAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFRU10.990.45
+4.26%
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
LFSC47.800.35
+0.75%
F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
SCYB26.030.02
+0.08%
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
CPSF26.50N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Feb
FTMU7.73N/A
N/A
Franklin Municipal Income ETF

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
+2.67%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
FSM - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
CGAU - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
More

GOAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOAU has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOAU jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOAU
1D Price
Change %
GOAU100%
+2.55%
WPM - GOAU
94%
Closely correlated
+5.01%
OR - GOAU
90%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
FNV - GOAU
90%
Closely correlated
+2.94%
DRD - GOAU
88%
Closely correlated
+4.03%
HMY - GOAU
87%
Closely correlated
+6.90%
More