Analysis and predictions GDXJ vs PAAS
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDXJ is a Buy and PAAS is a Hold.
PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GDXJ | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWUS | 34.29 | 0.58 | +1.72% |
| iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cp ETF | |||
| IPOS | 13.51 | 0.11 | +0.82% |
| Renaissance International IPO ETF | |||
| HYLB | 35.20 | 0.12 | +0.34% |
| Xtrackers USD High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
| CEMB | 43.83 | 0.08 | +0.18% |
| iShares JP Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| BUCK | 24.67 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Simplify Stable Income ETF | |||
GDXJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDXJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | 100% | +2.41% | ||
| AEM - GDXJ | 91% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| PAAS - GDXJ | 89% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| KGC - GDXJ | 88% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| AGI - GDXJ | 87% Closely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| GOLD - GDXJ | 85% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||
PAAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS | 100% | +2.08% | ||
| AG - PAAS | 81% Closely correlated | +4.12% | ||
| AEM - PAAS | 81% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| MAG - PAAS | 80% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| HL - PAAS | 79% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| GOLD - PAAS | 79% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||