GDYN
Price
$11.48
Change
-$0.59 (-4.89%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
970.61M
47 days until earnings call
MFH
Price
$3.79
Change
-$0.31 (-7.56%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
241.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDYN vs MFH

Header iconGDYN vs MFH Comparison
Open Charts GDYN vs MFHBanner chart's image
Grid Dynamics Holdings
Price$11.48
Change-$0.59 (-4.89%)
Volume$601.28K
Capitalization970.61M
Mercurity Fintech Holding
Price$3.79
Change-$0.31 (-7.56%)
Volume$152.88K
Capitalization241.37M
GDYN vs MFH Comparison Chart
Loading...
GDYN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GDYN vs. MFH commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDYN is a StrongBuy and MFH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (GDYN: $11.48 vs. MFH: $3.79)
Brand notoriety: GDYN and MFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GDYN: 95% vs. MFH: 81%
Market capitalization -- GDYN: $970.61M vs. MFH: $241.37M
GDYN [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $970.61M. MFH’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $241.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $257.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GDYN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GDYN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFH is a better buy in the long-term than GDYN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GDYN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GDYN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFH is a better buy in the short-term than GDYN.

Price Growth

GDYN (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -5.51% price change this week, while MFH (@Information Technology Services) price change was -10.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

GDYN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MFH is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-3.27% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDYN($971M) has a higher market cap than MFH($241M). MFH YTD gains are higher at: -44.510 vs. GDYN (-48.381).
GDYNMFHGDYN / MFH
Capitalization971M241M403%
EBITDA22.2MN/A-
Gain YTD-48.381-44.510109%
P/E Ratio88.31N/A-
Revenue371MN/A-
Total Cash326MN/A-
Total Debt11.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GDYN vs MFH: Fundamental Ratings
GDYN
MFH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8981
SMR RATING
1..100
8797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFH's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as GDYN (77). This means that MFH’s stock grew similarly to GDYN’s over the last 12 months.

MFH's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as GDYN (89). This means that MFH’s stock grew similarly to GDYN’s over the last 12 months.

GDYN's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MFH (97). This means that GDYN’s stock grew similarly to MFH’s over the last 12 months.

MFH's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as GDYN (65). This means that MFH’s stock grew similarly to GDYN’s over the last 12 months.

GDYN's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MFH (100). This means that GDYN’s stock grew similarly to MFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDYNMFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GDYN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSMYX23.07N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Instl
HHHTX18.90N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R5
PRPQX6.41N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Energy Infrastructure R6
CPCRX4.42N/A
N/A
Comstock Capital Value I
SDVRX24.67N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R

GDYN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDYN has been loosely correlated with EPAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDYN jumps, then EPAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDYN
1D Price
Change %
GDYN100%
-4.89%
EPAM - GDYN
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
FLYW - GDYN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
CTSH - GDYN
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
KD - GDYN
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
EXLS - GDYN
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
More

MFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFH has been loosely correlated with DTST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFH jumps, then DTST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFH
1D Price
Change %
MFH100%
-7.56%
DTST - MFH
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
BTCS - MFH
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
GRYP - MFH
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.90%
GDYN - MFH
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.89%
JEF - MFH
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
More