Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GEBAX vs RNWFX
GEBAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEBAX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq A
Price$11.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.74M
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.05
Change+$0.56 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
GEBAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEBAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEBAX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. GEBAX (22.7M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEBAX: RNWFX (1.04) vs GEBAX (0.58). GEBAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEBAX (7 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GEBAX (3.10) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GEBAX (34.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEBAX: RNWFX (250) vs GEBAX (1000). GEBAX (12.30) and RNWFX (11.83) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.20 vs. GEBAX (9.77).
| GEBAX | RNWFX | GEBAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.62 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.10 | 0.62 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.170 | 16.554 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.7M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.04 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.30 | 11.83 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.51 | 40.39 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.77 | 33.20 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement