Ad is loading...
GEBAX vs RNWFX
GEBAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEBAX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq A
Price$9.57
Change+$0.25 (+2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.93M
American Funds New World R5
Price$75.33
Change+$1.41 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.18B
GEBAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEBAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEBAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 58.2B vs. GEBAX (19.9M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEBAX: RNWFX (1.17) vs GEBAX (0.64). GEBAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEBAX (7 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GEBAX (3.04) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GEBAX (34.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEBAX: RNWFX (250) vs GEBAX (1000). GEBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.59 vs. RNWFX (-4.17). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.65 vs. GEBAX (9.19).
| GEBAX | RNWFX | GEBAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.62 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.04 | 0.62 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.668 | -2.498 | 227% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 58.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.17 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | -4.17 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.67 | 3.94 | -271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | 34.65 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...