Ad is loading...
GEBSX vs RNWFX
GEBSX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEBSX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq R6
Price$9.59
Change+$0.24 (+2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.93M
American Funds New World R5
Price$75.33
Change+$1.41 (+1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.18B
GEBSX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEBSX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEBSX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 58.2B vs. GEBSX (19.9M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEBSX: RNWFX (1.17) vs GEBSX (0.92). GEBSX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEBSX (7 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GEBSX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GEBSX (34.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEBSX: RNWFX (250) vs GEBSX (5000000). GEBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.20 vs. RNWFX (-4.17). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.65 vs. GEBSX (11.12).
| GEBSX | RNWFX | GEBSX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 0.62 | 431% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.556 | -2.498 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 58.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.17 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.20 | -4.17 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.73 | 3.94 | -247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.12 | 34.65 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers