Ad is loading...
GEMCX vs RNWFX
GEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEMCX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$18.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds New World R5
Price$78.09
Change+$0.35 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.57B
GEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.6B vs. GEMCX (2.66B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEMCX: RNWFX (1.51) vs GEMCX (0.36). GEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEMCX (27 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GEMCX (32.00) and RNWFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs GEMCX (1000). GEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. RNWFX (7.43). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.26 vs. GEMCX (-6.02).
| GEMCX | RNWFX | GEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.633 | 1.074 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 62.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.51 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | 7.43 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.53 | -2.85 | 685% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.02 | 11.26 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.50 | 50.71 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...