Ad is loading...
GEMCX vs RNWFX
GEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEMCX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq C
Price$18.91
Change-$0.46 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
American Funds New World R5
Price$77.31
Change-$1.87 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
GEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. GEMCX (2.65B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEMCX: RNWFX (1.17) vs GEMCX (0.00). GEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEMCX (27 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GEMCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX (37.00) and GEMCX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs GEMCX (1000). GEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.56 vs. RNWFX (-1.48). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.78 vs. GEMCX (32.35).
| GEMCX | RNWFX | GEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.62 | 335% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.62 | 360% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.216 | 0.065 | 3,425% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 62.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.56 | -1.48 | -376% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.50 | 0.31 | -2,784% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.35 | 50.78 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.60 | 42.27 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers