Ad is loading...
GEMUX vs RNWFX
GEMUX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GEMUX vs RNWFX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq R6
Price$23.65
Change+$0.21 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.12
Change+$0.87 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
GEMUX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEMUX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEMUX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. GEMUX (2.6B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than GEMUX: RNWFX (1.17) vs GEMUX (1.07). GEMUX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GEMUX (10 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). GEMUX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX (37.00) and GEMUX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GEMUX: RNWFX (250) vs GEMUX (5000000). GEMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. RNWFX (2.81). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GEMUX (27.30).
| GEMUX | RNWFX | GEMUX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.861 | 2.407 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 61.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.17 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 2.81 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.95 | 13.54 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.30 | 40.31 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers