Ad is loading...
GEN
Price
$29.58
Change
-$0.46 (-1.53%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
73 days until earnings call
INLX
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.07 (+0.54%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
128 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GEN vs INLX

Header iconGEN vs INLX Comparison
Open Charts GEN vs INLXBanner chart's image
Gen Digital
Price$29.58
Change-$0.46 (-1.53%)
Volume$2.33M
CapitalizationN/A
Intellinetics
Price$13.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
Volume$7.41K
CapitalizationN/A
GEN vs INLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GEN vs. INLX commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEN is a StrongSell and INLX is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GEN: $29.58 vs. INLX: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: GEN and INLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GEN: 71% vs. INLX: 80%
Market capitalization -- GEN: $14.27B vs. INLX: $25.95M
GEN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $14.27B. INLX’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GEN’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileINLX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GEN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • INLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEN is a better buy in the long-term than INLX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GEN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while INLX (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

GEN is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

INLX is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEN($14.3B) has a higher market cap than INLX($25.9M). INLX has higher P/E ratio than GEN: INLX (57.91) vs GEN (10.10). INLX YTD gains are higher at: 156.917 vs. GEN (31.684). GEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.58B vs. INLX (2.93M). GEN has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. INLX (1.69M). INLX has less debt than GEN: INLX (5.81M) vs GEN (9.3B). GEN has higher revenues than INLX: GEN (3.79B) vs INLX (16.7M).
GENINLXGEN / INLX
Capitalization14.3B25.9M55,212%
EBITDA1.58B2.93M54,135%
Gain YTD31.684156.91720%
P/E Ratio10.1057.9117%
Revenue3.79B16.7M22,707%
Total Cash490M1.69M29,011%
Total Debt9.3B5.81M160,096%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEN vs INLX: Fundamental Ratings
GEN
INLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8037
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2521
SMR RATING
1..100
3585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GEN's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for INLX (92). This means that GEN’s stock grew significantly faster than INLX’s over the last 12 months.

INLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as GEN (25). This means that INLX’s stock grew similarly to GEN’s over the last 12 months.

GEN's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INLX (85). This means that GEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than INLX’s over the last 12 months.

GEN's Price Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as INLX (35). This means that GEN’s stock grew similarly to INLX’s over the last 12 months.

INLX's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as GEN (5). This means that INLX’s stock grew similarly to GEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGENX51.870.37
+0.72%
Vanguard Energy Inv
VEUAX31.37-0.13
-0.41%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic A
JACBX18.22-0.16
-0.87%
JHancock Mid Cap Growth I
SDMGX17.55-0.17
-0.96%
Sit Developing Markets Growth
GMVCX16.38-0.16
-0.97%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value C

GEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEN has been loosely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GEN jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEN
1D Price
Change %
GEN100%
-1.53%
HOOD - GEN
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
UPBD - GEN
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
AKAM - GEN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
STEM - GEN
33%
Loosely correlated
-4.59%
PAYC - GEN
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
More

INLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INLX and QXO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INLX and QXO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INLX
1D Price
Change %
INLX100%
+0.54%
QXO - INLX
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
PYCR - INLX
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
LTCH - INLX
22%
Poorly correlated
+110.00%
GEN - INLX
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
SCWX - INLX
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More