Ad is loading...
GEOSX vs SFCWX
GEOSX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GEOSX vs SFCWX
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Ins
Price$13.46
Change-$0.42 (-3.03%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$69.92
Change-$2.19 (-3.04%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GEOSX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GEOSX vs. SFCWX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GEOSX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 76.3B vs. GEOSX (52.7M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GEOSX: SFCWX (0.95) vs GEOSX (0.00). GEOSX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GEOSX (7 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GEOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFCWX (29.00). GEOSX (1000000) and SFCWX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GEOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.51 vs. SFCWX (4.40). GEOSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.53 vs. SFCWX (14.72).
| GEOSX | SFCWX | GEOSX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.793 | 3.279 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.7M | 76.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.51 | 4.40 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.33 | -10.15 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.53 | 14.72 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |