Ad is loading...
GFACX vs HNASX
GFACX vs HNASX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs HNASX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$59.96
Change+$0.40 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
GFACX vs HNASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. HNASX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and HNASX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. HNASX (361M). GFACX (0.00) and HNASX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than HNASX: GFACX (24 years) vs HNASX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than HNASX (0.84). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HNASX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNASX: GFACX (250) vs HNASX (500). HNASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.88 vs. GFACX (-2.96). HNASX return over 5 years is better than : 75.72 vs. GFACX (55.98).
| GFACX | HNASX | GFACX / HNASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.960 | -7.147 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 361M | 76,177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.96 | 0.88 | -336% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.28 | 15.33 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.98 | 75.72 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.82 | 110.20 | 40% |