Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs JHBCX
GFACX vs JHBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs JHBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.05
Change+$0.64 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$63.15
Change+$0.67 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
GFACX vs JHBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. JHBCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and JHBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. JHBCX (5.51B). GFACX (0.00) and JHBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than JHBCX: GFACX (24 years) vs JHBCX (20 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: JHBCX (0) vs GFACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. GFACX (7.19). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.43 vs. JHBCX (30.57).
| GFACX | JHBCX | GFACX / JHBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.76 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.77 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.160 | 2.662 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 5.51B | 5,535% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 7.97 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.50 | 51.72 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 30.57 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.69 | 77.36 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement