Ad is loading...
GFACX vs JHBCX
GFACX vs JHBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs JHBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$54.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
GFACX vs JHBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. JHBCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and JHBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. JHBCX (4.69B). GFACX (0.00) and JHBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than JHBCX: GFACX (24 years) vs JHBCX (20 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: JHBCX (0) vs GFACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.72 vs. GFACX (-7.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. JHBCX (32.10).
| GFACX | JHBCX | GFACX / JHBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.76 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.77 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -12.915 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 4.69B | 5,560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -3.72 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | 14.20 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 32.10 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 49.18 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...