Ad is loading...
GFACX vs JHBCX
GFACX vs JHBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs JHBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.33
Change+$2.36 (+3.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$60.07
Change+$2.42 (+4.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
GFACX vs JHBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. JHBCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and JHBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. JHBCX (5.13B). GFACX (0.00) and JHBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than JHBCX: GFACX (24 years) vs JHBCX (20 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: JHBCX (0) vs GFACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. GFACX (1.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.99 vs. JHBCX (32.16).
| GFACX | JHBCX | GFACX / JHBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.76 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.77 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.807 | -5.274 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.13B | 5,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 4.74 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.17 | 44.63 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.99 | 32.16 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.88 | 61.36 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...