Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.62
Change+$0.69 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$53.27
Change+$0.69 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.41B
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. LGLFX (7.41B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.83 vs. GFACX (8.68). LGLFX (41.04) and GFACX (39.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.75 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.759 | 8.206 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 7.41B | 4,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 23.83 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 91.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.40 | 41.04 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | 125.43 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers