Ad is loading...
Compare predictions GFACX vs LGLFX
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.28
Change+$0.44 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$32.90
Change+$0.19 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFACX vs. LGLFX commentary
Dec 02, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LGLFX (5.37B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFACX (23 years) vs LGLFX (12 years). GFACX (1.39) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.76). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLFX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.58 vs. GFACX (15.64). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.72 vs. GFACX (22.40).
| GFACX | LGLFX | GFACX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.66 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.76 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.112 | 29.121 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 5.37B | 3,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.64 | 17.58 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.47 | -25.46 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.40 | 54.72 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | 126.80 | 83% |