Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLVX
GFACX vs LGLVX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLVX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.04
Change+$0.58 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R6
Price$51.59
Change+$0.37 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs LGLVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLVX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. LGLVX (7.27B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLVX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLVX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLVX (9 years). LGLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). LGLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLVX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.32 vs. GFACX (18.45). LGLVX return over 5 years is better than : 75.60 vs. GFACX (39.36).
| GFACX | LGLVX | GFACX / LGLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.255 | 49.233 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301B | 7.27B | 4,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | 49.32 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.66 | 21.50 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.36 | 75.60 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.22 | N/A | - |