Ad is loading...
GFACX vs MBCNX
GFACX vs MBCNX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MBCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$61.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3
Price$14.69
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
GFACX vs MBCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MBCNX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MBCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MBCNX (1.97B). GFACX (0.00) and MBCNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MBCNX: GFACX (24 years) vs MBCNX (22 years). GFACX (1.36) and MBCNX (1.35) have similar cost to investors . GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCNX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCNX: GFACX (250) vs MBCNX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.11 vs. MBCNX (-7.03). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.48 vs. MBCNX (-28.20).
| GFACX | MBCNX | GFACX / MBCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.35 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.35 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.807 | -5.712 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.97B | 14,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | -7.03 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | -11.19 | -243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.48 | -28.20 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.30 | -11.60 | -391% |