Ad is loading...
GFACX vs NBGUX
GFACX vs NBGUX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NBGUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$63.49
Change-$1.39 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.58B
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$27.85
Change-$0.62 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
GFACX vs NBGUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NBGUX commentary
Feb 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and NBGUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. NBGUX (2.56B). GFACX (0.00) and NBGUX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NBGUX: GFACX (24 years) vs NBGUX (29 years). NBGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). NBGUX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: NBGUX (0) vs GFACX (250). NBGUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. GFACX (6.58). NBGUX return over 5 years is better than : 56.13 vs. GFACX (42.61).
| GFACX | NBGUX | GFACX / NBGUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.423 | 0.636 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301B | 2.56B | 11,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.58 | 8.83 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.98 | 19.57 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.61 | 56.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.60 | 42.27 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...