Ad is loading...
GFACX vs NWADX
GFACX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$61.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$18.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.96M
GFACX vs NWADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NWADX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and NWADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. NWADX (177M). GFACX (0.00) and NWADX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NWADX: GFACX (24 years) vs NWADX (7 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NWADX (1.01). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: GFACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. GFACX (1.11). NWADX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. GFACX (34.48).
| GFACX | NWADX | GFACX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.92 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.01 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.807 | -5.219 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 177M | 161,582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 7.27 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 43.10 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.48 | 39.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...