Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RDLAX
GFACX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.90
Change+$0.75 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.09B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$11.03
Change+$0.12 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.45M
GFACX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RDLAX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 303B vs. RDLAX (315M). GFACX (0.00) and RDLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFACX (24 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFACX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. RDLAX (17.09). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.07 vs. RDLAX (14.54).
| GFACX | RDLAX | GFACX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.356 | 2.319 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303B | 315M | 96,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | 17.09 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 9.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.07 | 14.54 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.62 | 27.20 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...