Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RDLCX
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$61.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$8.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.75M
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RDLCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RDLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. RDLCX (262M). GFACX (0.00) and RDLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFACX (24 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFACX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.11 vs. RDLCX (-5.25). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.48 vs. RDLCX (1.31).
| GFACX | RDLCX | GFACX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.92 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.807 | -7.818 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 262M | 108,779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | -5.25 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 11.13 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.48 | 1.31 | 2,627% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.30 | -6.08 | -745% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...