Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RDLCX
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$7.90
Change+$0.14 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.26M
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RDLCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RDLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RDLCX (252M). GFACX (0.00) and RDLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFACX (24 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFACX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. RDLCX (-13.87). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. RDLCX (0.52).
| GFACX | RDLCX | GFACX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.92 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -15.744 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 252M | 103,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -13.87 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | -8.17 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 0.52 | 7,207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | -14.06 | -251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...