Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RDLCX
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.56
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.2B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.08M
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RDLCX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RDLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. RDLCX (325M). GFACX (0.00) and RDLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFACX (24 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFACX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.05 vs. RDLCX (14.71). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.72 vs. RDLCX (7.03).
| GFACX | RDLCX | GFACX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.270 | 4.126 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 325M | 96,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.05 | 14.71 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.88 | 10.36 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.72 | 7.03 | 565% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.28 | 10.23 | 638% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers