Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RDLCX
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.21
Change-$0.25 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.71M
GFACX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RDLCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RDLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. RDLCX (312M). GFACX (0.00) and RDLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFACX (24 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFACX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. RDLCX (4.42). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. RDLCX (2.22).
| GFACX | RDLCX | GFACX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 312M | 97,436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 4.42 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 8.35 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 2.22 | 1,479% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | 0.99 | 5,637% |