Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RRBGX
GFACX vs RRBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RRBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth R
Price$144.29
Change-$0.62 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.33B
GFACX vs RRBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RRBGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RRBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RRBGX (53.3B). GFACX (0.00) and RRBGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RRBGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RRBGX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RRBGX (1.23). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RRBGX (15.70). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRBGX: GFACX (250) vs RRBGX (2500). RRBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.48 vs. GFACX (-4.76). GFACX (27.92) and RRBGX (27.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | RRBGX | GFACX / RRBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.261 | -13.698 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 53.3B | 490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | -3.48 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | 7.87 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.92 | 27.40 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 108.47 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...