Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGYX
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.93
Change+$0.44 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.85B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$39.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
GFACX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGYX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 318B vs. WLGYX (8.05B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGYX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFACX (24 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WLGYX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGYX (0) vs GFACX (250). WLGYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. GFACX (8.28). WLGYX return over 5 years is better than : 45.58 vs. GFACX (38.04).
| GFACX | WLGYX | GFACX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.677 | 3.319 | 292% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 318B | 8.05B | 3,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.28 | 8.88 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.23 | 49.41 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.04 | 45.58 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.05 | 98.18 | 66% |