Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs HSUCX
GFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.19M
GFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HSUCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. HSUCX (71.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs HSUCX (11 years). HSUCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFAFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. GFAFX (3.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. HSUCX (13.01).
| GFAFX | HSUCX | GFAFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.23 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.23 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -4.025 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 71.2M | 398,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 10.09 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 40.91 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 13.01 | 341% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | -84.42 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...