Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs ILGCX
GFAFX vs ILGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ILGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
Price$19.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.99M
GFAFX vs ILGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ILGCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and ILGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. ILGCX (194M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ILGCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs ILGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ILGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs ILGCX (11 years). ILGCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). ILGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGCX: GFAFX (250) vs ILGCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. ILGCX (-2.33). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. ILGCX (10.22).
| GFAFX | ILGCX | GFAFX / ILGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.79 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.18 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -7.119 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 194M | 146,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -2.33 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 10.14 | 336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 10.22 | 434% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 19.91 | 308% |