Ad is loading...
Analysis and predictions GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$63.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$32.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Nov 29, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. LGLFX (5.39B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.22) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (23 years) vs LGLFX (12 years). LGLFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.07 vs. GFAFX (19.94). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.84 vs. GFAFX (22.57).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.66 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.76 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.438 | 28.728 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 5.39B | 3,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.94 | 22.07 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.73 | -25.08 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.57 | 55.84 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.99 | 124.14 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...