Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLFX
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.68
Change+$0.54 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.06B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$52.69
Change+$0.90 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.46B
GFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. LGLFX (7.46B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFAFX (0.45) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.54 vs. GFAFX (22.36). LGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.39 vs. GFAFX (49.68).
| GFAFX | LGLFX | GFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.315 | 5.200 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 7.46B | 4,155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.36 | 43.54 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.14 | 47.80 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.68 | 67.39 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.61 | 131.62 | 64% |