Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGRNX
GFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.41
Change+$0.42 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$31.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.03B
GFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGRNX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGRNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. LGRNX (17B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGRNX: GFAFX (0.32) vs LGRNX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGRNX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGRNX (12 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than LGRNX (0.57). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: GFAFX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.64 vs. GFAFX (10.62). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.03 vs. GFAFX (54.59).
| GFAFX | LGRNX | GFAFX / LGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.802 | 7.181 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319B | 17B | 1,876% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 15.64 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.48 | 68.11 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.59 | 62.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.65 | 198.17 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement