Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MBCLX
GFAFX vs MBCLX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MBCLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Adm
Price$20.65
Change+$0.17 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
GFAFX vs MBCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MBCLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MBCLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. MBCLX (1.96B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MBCLX: GFAFX (0.35) vs MBCLX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MBCLX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MBCLX (24 years). MBCLX (0.95) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCLX (11.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCLX: GFAFX (250) vs MBCLX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. MBCLX (-2.01). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. MBCLX (-11.81).
| GFAFX | MBCLX | GFAFX / MBCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.95 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.95 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -6.141 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 1.96B | 14,490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -2.01 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 4.78 | 714% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | -11.81 | -375% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 14.80 | 414% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...