Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MBCNX
GFAFX vs MBCNX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MBCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3
Price$14.69
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
GFAFX vs MBCNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MBCNX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MBCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MBCNX (1.97B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MBCNX: GFAFX (0.35) vs MBCNX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MBCNX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MBCNX (22 years). MBCNX (1.35) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCNX (11.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCNX: GFAFX (250) vs MBCNX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. MBCNX (-7.03). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. MBCNX (-28.20).
| GFAFX | MBCNX | GFAFX / MBCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.35 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.35 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -5.712 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.97B | 14,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -7.03 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | -11.19 | -295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | -28.20 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | -11.60 | -529% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...