Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NLCCX
GFAFX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$29.67
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.14M
GFAFX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NLCCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. NLCCX (752M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NLCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NLCCX (28 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. NLCCX (1.09). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. NLCCX (-15.23).
| GFAFX | NLCCX | GFAFX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.59 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.59 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -7.656 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 752M | 37,899% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | 1.09 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 8.48 | 389% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | -15.23 | -290% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | 0.78 | 7,860% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...