Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWADX
GFAFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.37
Change-$0.29 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWADX commentary
Nov 13, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. NWADX (227M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: GFAFX (0.45) vs NWADX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWADX (6 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NWADX (12.63). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: GFAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.62 vs. GFAFX (35.27). NWADX return over 5 years is better than : 69.24 vs. GFAFX (59.88).
| GFAFX | NWADX | GFAFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.426 | 34.547 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 227M | 135,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.27 | 37.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.96 | 4.83 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.88 | 69.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...