Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWADX
GFAFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$18.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.96M
GFAFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. NWADX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. NWADX (177M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: GFAFX (0.35) vs NWADX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWADX (7 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: GFAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. GFAFX (3.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. NWADX (39.05).
| GFAFX | NWADX | GFAFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.92 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.01 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -5.219 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 177M | 161,582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | 7.27 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 43.10 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | 39.05 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...