Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWADX
GFAFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$19.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFAFX vs. NWADX commentary
Sep 20, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and NWADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. NWADX (203M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: GFAFX (0.45) vs NWADX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWADX (6 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NWADX (12.63). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: GFAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.62 vs. NWADX (21.75). NWADX (52.91) and GFAFX (50.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | NWADX | GFAFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.278 | 19.029 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 203M | 139,901% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.62 | 21.75 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.34 | -2.56 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | 52.91 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.13 | N/A | - |