Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PNOPX
GFAFX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.88
Change+$0.70 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$126.91
Change+$0.56 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.66B
GFAFX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOPX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and PNOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. PNOPX (6.66B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PNOPX (0.15). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PNOPX (34 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOPX (25.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOPX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.63 vs. PNOPX (14.00). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.38 vs. PNOPX (34.67).
| GFAFX | PNOPX | GFAFX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.586 | 3.659 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 6.66B | 4,655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.15 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.63 | 14.00 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.38 | 10.98 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.38 | 34.67 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.39 | 72.34 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers