Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PNOYX
GFAFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$140.56
Change-$2.55 (-1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.5B
GFAFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PNOYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. PNOYX (6.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PNOYX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PNOYX (0.30). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOYX (25.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. PNOYX (5.87). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. PNOYX (33.48).
| GFAFX | PNOYX | GFAFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.078 | 1.275 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 6.5B | 4,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.30 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 5.87 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.02 | 18.94 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.32 | 33.48 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.87 | 72.87 | 100% |