Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RDLAX
GFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$74.18
Change-$9.64 (-11.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$10.84
Change-$0.42 (-3.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and RDLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. RDLAX (327M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GFAFX (0.45) vs RDLAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFAFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.22 vs. RDLAX (22.13). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.56 vs. RDLAX (23.19).
| GFAFX | RDLAX | GFAFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.876 | 21.730 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313B | 327M | 95,719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.22 | 22.13 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.46 | 8.06 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.56 | 23.19 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.31 | 28.38 | 343% |