Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RDLCX
GFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$8.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.75M
GFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RDLCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RDLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. RDLCX (262M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. RDLCX (-5.25). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. RDLCX (1.31).
| GFAFX | RDLCX | GFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.81 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.92 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -7.818 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 262M | 108,779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -5.25 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 11.13 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | 1.31 | 3,362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | -6.08 | -1,009% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...