Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RRBGX
GFAFX vs RRBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.20
Change+$0.52 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.2B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth R
Price$176.36
Change+$1.07 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.54B
GFAFX vs RRBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRBGX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RRBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. RRBGX (66.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRBGX: GFAFX (0.45) vs RRBGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRBGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RRBGX (22 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RRBGX (9.80). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRBGX: GFAFX (250) vs RRBGX (2500). RRBGX (23.83) and GFAFX (22.69) have marching annual gain over last year. GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.69 vs. RRBGX (44.66).
| GFAFX | RRBGX | GFAFX / RRBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.020 | 5.032 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 66.5B | 469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.69 | 23.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.48 | 24.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.69 | 44.66 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.15 | 166.85 | 50% |