Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.03
Change-$1.83 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.64B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R
Price$96.52
Change-$2.13 (-2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.53B
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRGSX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. RRGSX (52.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: GFAFX (0.45) vs RRGSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RRGSX (22 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RRGSX (28.90). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.94 vs. RRGSX (17.37). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.98 vs. RRGSX (34.23).
| GFAFX | RRGSX | GFAFX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.453 | 4.194 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 52.5B | 594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.94 | 17.37 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.14 | 21.13 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.98 | 34.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.05 | 85.39 | 93% |