Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RRGSX
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RRGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.26
Change+$0.87 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R
Price$96.00
Change+$0.96 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.64B
GFAFX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RRGSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. RRGSX (51.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RRGSX: GFAFX (0.45) vs RRGSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RRGSX (22 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RRGSX (28.90). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.21 vs. RRGSX (19.60). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.81 vs. RRGSX (32.34).
| GFAFX | RRGSX | GFAFX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.389 | 0.904 | 375% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 51.6B | 595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.21 | 19.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.67 | 8.70 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.81 | 32.34 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.01 | 94.77 | 89% |