Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs UMLGX
GFAFX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$8.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets700.45M
GFAFX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. UMLGX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. UMLGX (700M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs UMLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFAFX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. UMLGX (-10.72). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. UMLGX (-35.70).
| GFAFX | UMLGX | GFAFX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -3.666 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 700M | 40,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -10.72 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 5.52 | 597% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | -35.70 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | -56.47 | -109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...