Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs VCBCX
GFAFX vs VCBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs VCBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.86
Change+$0.46 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
VALIC Company I Systematic Growth
Price$19.61
Change+$0.13 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
GFAFX vs VCBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. VCBCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and VCBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. VCBCX (1.04B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than VCBCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs VCBCX (0.08). GFAFX was incepted earlier than VCBCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs VCBCX (25 years). VCBCX (0.83) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). VCBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). VCBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: VCBCX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. VCBCX (6.66). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.46 vs. VCBCX (-13.92).
| GFAFX | VCBCX | GFAFX / VCBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.83 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.337 | -2.561 | -482% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 1.04B | 31,304% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.08 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.67 | 6.66 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.22 | 26.44 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.46 | -13.92 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.67 | 3.22 | 2,566% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement