Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs WFPDX
GFAFX vs WFPDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WFPDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.25
Change-$3.95 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr Adm
Price$9.81
Change-$0.66 (-6.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
GFAFX vs WFPDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WFPDX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and WFPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. WFPDX (1.23B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WFPDX: GFAFX (0.35) vs WFPDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WFPDX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WFPDX (15 years). WFPDX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). WFPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFPDX: GFAFX (250) vs WFPDX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. WFPDX (-8.16). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. WFPDX (-6.35).
| GFAFX | WFPDX | GFAFX / WFPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.08 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -8.479 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 1.23B | 22,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -8.16 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.18 | -24.73 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | -6.35 | -1,120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.48 | -34.73 | -174% |