Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs WSACX
GFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$74.18
Change-$9.64 (-11.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.07
Change-$1.03 (-3.42%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WSACX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WSACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. WSACX (62.7M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: GFAFX (0.45) vs WSACX (0.34). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.06 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: GFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.22 vs. WSACX (28.26). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.56 vs. WSACX (36.72).
| GFAFX | WSACX | GFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.876 | 27.343 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313B | 62.7M | 499,203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.34 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.22 | 28.26 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.46 | 7.74 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.56 | 36.72 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.31 | 35.26 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers