GFCOF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MNDDF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.05 (+27.78%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

GFCOF vs MNDDF

Header iconGFCOF vs MNDDF Comparison
Open Charts GFCOF vs MNDDFBanner chart's image
Good Flour
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Monde Nissin
Price$0.23
Change+$0.05 (+27.78%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
GFCOF vs MNDDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFCOF vs. MNDDF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFCOF is a Hold and MNDDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GFCOF: $0.06 vs. MNDDF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: GFCOF and MNDDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFCOF: 25% vs. MNDDF: 135%
Market capitalization -- GFCOF: $14.76M vs. MNDDF: $2.7B
GFCOF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.76M. MNDDF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNDDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNDDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNDDF is a better buy in the long-term than GFCOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFCOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GFCOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GFCOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +24.04% price change this week, while MNDDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.68% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNDDF($2.7B) has a higher market cap than GFCOF($14.8M). MNDDF YTD gains are higher at: 23.877 vs. GFCOF (-51.504). GFCOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.9M vs. MNDDF (-9.3B). MNDDF has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. GFCOF (376K). GFCOF has less debt than MNDDF: GFCOF (534K) vs MNDDF (11.1B). MNDDF has higher revenues than GFCOF: MNDDF (75.6B) vs GFCOF (1.08M).
GFCOFMNDDFGFCOF / MNDDF
Capitalization14.8M2.7B1%
EBITDA-4.9M-9.3B0%
Gain YTD-51.50423.877-216%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.08M75.6B0%
Total Cash376K13.5B0%
Total Debt534K11.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFCOF: Fundamental Ratings
GFCOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFCOFMNDDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GFCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIGYX11.430.09
+0.79%
Loomis Sayles International Growth Y
AEMMX10.90-0.03
-0.27%
American Century Emerging Markets A
JRSTX11.92-0.05
-0.42%
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq T
NWHUX35.30-0.18
-0.51%
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci Instl Svc
CSCIX14.42-0.09
-0.62%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities C

GFCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFCOF and BRCNF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFCOF and BRCNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFCOF
1D Price
Change %
GFCOF100%
-3.73%
BRCNF - GFCOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
MNDDF - GFCOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CULTF - GFCOF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
GWLL - GFCOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOOOF - GFCOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNDDF has been closely correlated with GWLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MNDDF jumps, then GWLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNDDF
1D Price
Change %
MNDDF100%
N/A
GWLL - MNDDF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
KRYAF - MNDDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.35%
HLNFF - MNDDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
CULTF - MNDDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.39%
GFCOF - MNDDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More