Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCAX
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$77.56
Change-$0.26 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$56.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets890.32M
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. NWCAX (890M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: GFFFX (0.56) vs NWCAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. NWCAX (-2.14). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.49 vs. NWCAX (32.98).
| GFFFX | NWCAX | GFFFX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.08 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 2.093 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 890M | 34,270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | -2.14 | -414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.51 | 30.87 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | 32.98 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.82 | 27.08 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers