Ad is loading...
GFFFX vs NWCAX
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$72.42
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$52.85
Change+$0.33 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.3M
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. NWCAX (831M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: GFFFX (0.61) vs NWCAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. NWCAX (-6.03). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.60 vs. NWCAX (30.03).
| GFFFX | NWCAX | GFFFX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.08 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.359 | -6.030 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 831M | 34,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.87 | -6.03 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 28.82 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.60 | 30.03 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.84 | 16.97 | 370% |