Ad is loading...
GFFFX vs NWCAX
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$66.65
Change-$3.98 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$48.20
Change-$3.02 (-5.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets818.98M
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NWCAX (819M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: GFFFX (0.62) vs NWCAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.10 vs. NWCAX (-8.91). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.69 vs. NWCAX (56.59).
| GFFFX | NWCAX | GFFFX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.08 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.773 | -8.356 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 819M | 34,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | -8.91 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | -1.76 | -428% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.69 | 56.59 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.92 | 14.51 | 434% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...