Ad is loading...
GFFFX vs NWCFX
GFFFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$69.44
Change-$2.58 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$56.43
Change-$2.49 (-4.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.75M
GFFFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and NWCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. NWCFX (849M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFFFX (0.57) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.44 vs. NWCFX (-4.94). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.67 vs. NWCFX (47.41).
| GFFFX | NWCFX | GFFFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.51 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.69 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.899 | -5.909 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287B | 849M | 33,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.44 | -4.94 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.96 | 18.48 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.67 | 47.41 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.46 | 30.48 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers