Ad is loading...
GFFFX vs NWCFX
GFFFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$66.00
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$53.34
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.4M
GFFFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. NWCFX (755M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFFFX (0.62) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.64 vs. NWCFX (-11.07). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.30 vs. NWCFX (31.01).
| GFFFX | NWCFX | GFFFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.51 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.69 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.015 | -14.915 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 755M | 34,570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.64 | -11.07 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.76 | 2.52 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.30 | 31.01 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.03 | 16.40 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers