Ad is loading...
GFFFX vs SLGCX
GFFFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$70.63
Change+$0.72 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$4.72
Change+$0.04 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.01M
GFFFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. SLGCX (33M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFFFX (0.62) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs SLGCX (26 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.10 vs. SLGCX (-52.20). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.69 vs. SLGCX (-58.66).
| GFFFX | SLGCX | GFFFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.67 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.67 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.773 | -9.126 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 33M | 833,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | -52.20 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | -59.66 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.69 | -58.66 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.92 | -79.20 | -79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers