GFIOF
Price
$14.54
Change
+$0.10 (+0.69%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
MXTLF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Nov 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

GFIOF vs MXTLF

Header iconGFIOF vs MXTLF Comparison
Open Charts GFIOF vs MXTLFBanner chart's image
Gold Fields
Price$14.54
Change+$0.10 (+0.69%)
Volume$840
CapitalizationN/A
Metalex Ventures
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
GFIOF vs MXTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MXTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFIOF vs. MXTLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFIOF is a Buy and MXTLF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GFIOF: $14.55 vs. MXTLF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: GFIOF and MXTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFIOF: 165% vs. MXTLF: 300%
Market capitalization -- GFIOF: $13.9B vs. MXTLF: $5.92M
GFIOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.9B. MXTLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFIOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMXTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFIOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MXTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the long-term than MXTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFIOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MXTLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFIOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MXTLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the short-term than MXTLF.

Price Growth

GFIOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while MXTLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFIOF($13.9B) has a higher market cap than MXTLF($5.92M). GFIOF has higher P/E ratio than MXTLF: GFIOF (21.28) vs MXTLF (5.81). MXTLF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. GFIOF (-2.120). GFIOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.32B vs. MXTLF (-1.32M). GFIOF has more cash in the bank: 724M vs. MXTLF (2.48M). MXTLF has less debt than GFIOF: MXTLF (0) vs GFIOF (1.58B). GFIOF has higher revenues than MXTLF: GFIOF (4.45B) vs MXTLF (0).
GFIOFMXTLFGFIOF / MXTLF
Capitalization13.9B5.92M234,916%
EBITDA2.32B-1.32M-175,147%
Gain YTD-2.120100.000-2%
P/E Ratio21.285.81366%
Revenue4.45B0-
Total Cash724M2.48M29,241%
Total Debt1.58B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFIOF vs MXTLF: Fundamental Ratings
GFIOF
MXTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2884
SMR RATING
1..100
7628
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFIOF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXTLF (71). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXTLF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MXTLF (84). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MXTLF’s over the last 12 months.

MXTLF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFIOF (76). This means that MXTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFIOF’s over the last 12 months.

MXTLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GFIOF (53). This means that MXTLF’s stock grew similarly to GFIOF’s over the last 12 months.

MXTLF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as GFIOF (66). This means that MXTLF’s stock grew similarly to GFIOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFIOFMXTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MXTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FESIX5.29-0.03
-0.56%
Fidelity SAI Real Estate Index
ETIMX14.50-0.09
-0.62%
Eventide Balanced Fund Class I
AVEDX24.68-0.16
-0.64%
Ave Maria Rising Dividend
OSMNX34.43-0.25
-0.72%
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
RWIAX64.70-4.32
-6.26%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R1

GFIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFIOF has been loosely correlated with GFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFIOF jumps, then GFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFIOF
1D Price
Change %
GFIOF100%
N/A
GFI - GFIOF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.39%
MXTLF - GFIOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNGXF - GFIOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DC - GFIOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
HBEIF - GFIOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-16.05%
More

MXTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXTLF has been loosely correlated with BDLNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MXTLF jumps, then BDLNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXTLF
1D Price
Change %
MXTLF100%
N/A
BDLNF - MXTLF
63%
Loosely correlated
-9.32%
CJIMF - MXTLF
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ERYTF - MXTLF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZMPLF - MXTLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GFIOF - MXTLF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More