GFL
Price
$47.55
Change
-$0.43 (-0.90%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.81B
22 days until earnings call
WM
Price
$224.86
Change
-$2.06 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.6B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs WM

Header iconGFL vs WM Comparison
Open Charts GFL vs WMBanner chart's image
GFL Environmental
Price$47.55
Change-$0.43 (-0.90%)
Volume$11.13K
Capitalization12.81B
Waste Management
Price$224.86
Change-$2.06 (-0.91%)
Volume$13.14K
Capitalization85.6B
GFL vs WM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. WM commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a StrongBuy and WM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GFL: $47.55 vs. WM: $224.87)
Brand notoriety: GFL and WM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 74% vs. WM: 132%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $12.81B vs. WM: $85.6B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $12.81B. WM’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $85.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GFL and WM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WM is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while WM (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

WM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.51% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WM($85.6B) has a higher market cap than GFL($12.8B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than WM: GFL (359.45) vs WM (37.62). WM YTD gains are higher at: 12.239 vs. GFL (7.792). WM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.59B vs. GFL (2.22B). WM has more cash in the bank: 458M vs. GFL (136M). GFL has less debt than WM: GFL (9.29B) vs WM (16.2B). WM has higher revenues than GFL: WM (20.4B) vs GFL (7.52B).
GFLWMGFL / WM
Capitalization12.8B85.6B15%
EBITDA2.22B5.59B40%
Gain YTD7.79212.23964%
P/E Ratio359.4537.62956%
Revenue7.52B20.4B37%
Total Cash136M458M30%
Total Debt9.29B16.2B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WM: Fundamental Ratings
WM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTEI98.37-0.04
-0.04%
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tx-Exm Bd ETF
NBCR28.83-0.04
-0.12%
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
XLRE41.42-0.06
-0.14%
The Real Estate Select Sector SPDR®
MISL37.28-0.33
-0.88%
First Trust Indxx Aerspc & Defns ETF
TWM41.08-0.59
-1.42%
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-1.05%
WCN - GFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
RSG - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
CWST - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
WM - GFL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
CLH - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

WM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WM has been closely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WM jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WM
1D Price
Change %
WM100%
-0.90%
RSG - WM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
WCN - WM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
CWST - WM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
GFL - WM
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
CLH - WM
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
More