GFR
Price
$6.40
Change
-$0.14 (-2.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
411.56M
VET
Price
$8.91
Change
-$0.34 (-3.68%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.01B
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GFR vs VET

Header iconGFR vs VET Comparison
Open Charts GFR vs VETBanner chart's image
Greenfire Resources
Price$6.40
Change-$0.14 (-2.14%)
Volume$41.36K
Capitalization411.56M
Vermilion Energy
Price$8.91
Change-$0.34 (-3.68%)
Volume$856.18K
Capitalization2.01B
GFR vs VET Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFR vs. VET commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFR is a Hold and VET is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GFR: $6.40 vs. VET: $8.91)
Brand notoriety: GFR and VET are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFR: 56% vs. VET: 77%
Market capitalization -- GFR: $411.56M vs. VET: $2.01B
GFR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $411.56M. VET’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VET is a better buy in the long-term than GFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFR is a better buy in the short-term than VET.

Price Growth

GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while VET (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFR is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

VET is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VET($2.01B) has a higher market cap than GFR($412M). GFR has higher P/E ratio than VET: GFR (4.21) vs VET (2.80). VET YTD gains are higher at: -5.213 vs. GFR (-7.365). VET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 520M vs. GFR (60.9M). VET has more cash in the bank: 141M vs. GFR (110M). GFR has less debt than VET: GFR (390M) vs VET (947M). VET has higher revenues than GFR: VET (2.2B) vs GFR (676M).
GFRVETGFR / VET
Capitalization412M2.01B20%
EBITDA60.9M520M12%
Gain YTD-7.365-5.213141%
P/E Ratio4.212.80150%
Revenue676M2.2B31%
Total Cash110M141M78%
Total Debt390M947M41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VET: Fundamental Ratings
VET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFRVET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MWOIX66.26N/A
N/A
MFS Global Growth I
TRPIX47.42N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Value I
TNYRX10.47N/A
N/A
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
HNCFX18.50N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth F
FMSDX14.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity Multi-Asset Income

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with DVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then DVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
-0.30%
DVN - GFR
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
KRP - GFR
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
OBE - GFR
36%
Loosely correlated
+12.66%
VET - GFR
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
CNQ - GFR
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More