Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGBEX vs RCWHX
GGBEX vs RCWHX Comparison
Open Charts GGBEX vs RCWHX
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Instl
Price$8.79
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets624.9M
American Funds Capital World Bond R5E
Price$16.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
GGBEX vs RCWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGBEX vs. RCWHX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGBEX is a Hold and RCWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWHX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. GGBEX (625M). GGBEX pays higher dividends than RCWHX: GGBEX (3.72) vs RCWHX (3.41). GGBEX was incepted earlier than RCWHX: GGBEX (10 years) vs RCWHX (10 years). RCWHX (0.64) is less costly to investors than GGBEX (0.59). RCWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. GGBEX (57.00). RCWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGBEX: RCWHX (250) vs GGBEX (1000000). RCWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. GGBEX (6.71). GGBEX return over 5 years is better than : -0.64 vs. RCWHX (-9.13).
| GGBEX | RCWHX | GGBEX / RCWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.64 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.64 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.772 | 7.408 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 625M | 10B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 3.41 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 7.40 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.83 | 7.82 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.64 | -9.13 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement