Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGGPX vs RWMFX
GGGPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity P
Price$42.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.52
Change-$0.12 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.64B
GGGPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. GGGPX (1.37B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GGGPX (0.47). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGGPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGGPX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGGPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. GGGPX (5.12). RWMFX (52.31) and GGGPX (51.99) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GGGPX | RWMFX | GGGPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.677 | 5.674 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.37B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.48 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.12 | 6.60 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.26 | 30.38 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.99 | 52.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement