Ad is loading...
GGGPX vs RWMFX
GGGPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core P
Price$35.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$58.48
Change-$0.12 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.38B
GGGPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. GGGPX (1.18B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GGGPX (0.52). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGGPX (7 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGGPX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGGPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. GGGPX (-5.33). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.18 vs. GGGPX (44.02).
| GGGPX | RWMFX | GGGPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.631 | -4.381 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 177B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.53 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -0.20 | 2,718% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.04 | 4.43 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.02 | 49.18 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...